ABSTRACT
Background : Quality of life (QOL) scores inform researchers acquainted with such tools about patients' perception of various domains of their health. The scores provide a useful denominator for clinical trials, especially in chronic diseases with therapeutic side effects, such as HIV. However, in clinical settings, there is a felt need of description of problems commonly perceived by patients. Aim : This study describes the multidimensional health-related issues of HIV-positive patients. Settings and Design : Cross-sectional design with convenient sampling was used to recruit 138 HIV-positive patients at the outpatient section of the Department of Medicine of a tertiary care hospital in north India. Materials and Methods : A structured questionnaire was used to collect information about health-related problems. Identified problems were assessed using a Likert scale for severity. Results : Out of the 20 assessed problems, the patients reported positive for an average of 12.01 +/- 3.78 problems. The most prevalent problems were those related to emotions (98.6%), lack of energy (96.4%), and health perception (92.0%). The most distressing problems were 'feeling that health was not good' (77.5%) and 'health was bad' (75.4%). The number of problems reported was significantly related to weight loss ( P = 0.006) and clinical category ( P = 0.023). A significant correlation was observed between weight loss and problems in social activities ( P P P P = 0.002).Conclusion : Many patients have significant problems in dimensions other than physical. A physician's awareness about these problems is important for a holistic patient management.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of Human Deficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) on the quality of life (QOL) on such patients in North India. DESIGN: A cross sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient setting and wards, Department of Medicine at a premier tertiary health care center, North India. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight consecutive HIV/AIDS patients attending Medicine out patient department and/or admitted to the wards of All India Institute of Medical Sciences were administered a structured questionnaire by the HIV nurse coordinator. QOL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-Bref (Hindi) instrument. ANALYSIS: One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to find out significant difference between the clinical categories and socio-demographic variables on QOL domains. RESULTS: The overall QOL mean score on a scale of 0-100 was found to be 25.8. Similarly, on the scale of 0-100 the mean scores in the four domains of QOL in descending order were social (80.9); psychological (27.5); physical (17.7) and environmental domain (11.65). There was a significant difference of quality of life in the physical domain between asymptomatic patients (14.6) and patients with AIDS (10.43) defining illnesses (p< 0.001) and asymptomatic and early symptomatic (12) patients (p=0.014). QOL in the psychological domain was significantly poorer in early symptomatic (12.1) (p< 0.05) and AIDS patients (12.4) (p< 0.006) as compared to asymptomatic individuals (14.2). A significant difference in QOL scores in the psychological domain was observed with respect to the educational status (p< 0.037) and income of patients (p< 0.048). Significantly better QOL scores in the physical (p< 0.040) and environmental domain (p< 0.017) were present with respect to the occupation of the patients. Patients with family support had better QOL scores in environmental domain. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, QOL is associated with education, income, occupation, family support and clinical categories of the patients.